Guides

What Happened to Berkey: The EPA Orders and What to Buy Now

Two EPA orders, both still active, and a category where almost every certification claim means something narrower than it sounds. Read against the primary documents.

MC Marcus Chen ·Updated September 2026 ·12 min read
2
EPA stop-sale orders, both still listed as active
Dec 2022
First order, following a November 2022 inspection
0
Later filings on either docket, nearly four years on

The short version

The EPA issued two Stop Sale, Use, or Removal Orders covering Black Berkey filter products, one in December 2022 and one in May 2023. Both dockets still show a status of active, with no filings after the original orders. The agency’s stated basis was the microbiological claims made for the filters, which brought them under federal pesticide law as unregistered and misbranded products.

If you own a Berkey and need replacement elements, the practical question is what fits and what is actually certified. Culligan MaxClear elements carry the broadest certified claim set of any gravity element we could verify, though as with every option here the certification was established in the maker’s own system rather than in a Berkey housing.

Skip to what to buy now ›
The documents

What did the EPA actually do?

Most accounts of this say the EPA acted because Black Berkey elements contain silver. The orders themselves say something more specific, and the difference matters if you are trying to understand what happened.

An EPA inspector visited James Enterprise Inc., trading as Berkey Filters, in Pueblo, Colorado on 22 November 2022. The order records the labelling the inspector observed, including virus reduction above 99.999% and pathogenic bacteria reduction above 99.9999%, described as exceeding a Log 6 purification standard against a named anthrax surrogate. It also records website statements about removing 100% of pathogens and about classifying the systems as purifiers.

A separate statement about silver acting as an antimicrobial to self-sterilise the elements appears in that list too, as one item among several. The order’s conclusion names the claims collectively: these statements indicate the products are intended for preventing, destroying, repelling or mitigating a pest, and are therefore pesticides under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act.

Two violations followed. Distributing an unregistered pesticide under FIFRA section 12(a)(1)(A), because the products were not registered with the EPA. And distributing a misbranded pesticide under section 12(a)(1)(E), because the labels carried no establishment registration number.

The distinction in plain terms: under FIFRA, what a product claims to do can determine how it is regulated. The orders rest on the marketing and labelling claims about killing pathogens, not on a finding that anything in the filter is unsafe.

The record

The two orders, and where they stand

Both orders are public on the EPA’s administrative enforcement docket. Here is what each one says.

Order 1
Docket
FIFRA-08-2023-0011
Recipient
James Enterprise, Inc. DBA Berkey Filters
Filed
27 December 2022
Region
EPA Region 8
Docket status
Active, one filing, no later filings
Order 2
Docket
FIFRA-08-2023-0038
Recipient
Berkey International LLC, Cataño, Puerto Rico
Filed
8 May 2023
Region
EPA Region 8
Products named
Travel, Big, Royal, Imperial and Crown Berkey Water Filters
Docket status
Active, one filing, no later filings

The second order states that it remains in effect unless and until it is revoked, terminated, suspended or modified in writing by the EPA. As of 7 September 2026, neither docket records any filing after the original order in each case.

The orders also set out a process for exceptions. A recipient can ask the EPA in writing for permission to move or remove covered products, and must submit a written accounting of inventory within 30 days and every 30 days thereafter.

The limits of this

What the record does not tell you

We have read the orders and the docket entries. Several things people reasonably want to know are simply not answered by those documents, and we would rather say so than fill the gap.

  • Whether Black Berkey elements are still manufactured anywhere. The orders bind their named recipients. No document we have seen states that production has stopped globally.
  • When, or whether, standalone elements return. No filing on either docket sets a date, and we will not guess at one.
  • The current state of the related litigation. Published accounts disagree with one another on which cases remain open. We have not verified the court records directly, so this page makes no claim about them.
  • Whether any given element offered for sale is genuine. If provenance matters to you, buy from an authorised dealer and ask.

We are a review site, not a testing lab and not a law firm. Everything above about the orders comes from the EPA’s own filings, which are linked in the sources at the foot of this page so you can read them yourself.

The thing nobody explains

Why “certified” on a gravity element is rarely what it sounds like

If you shop for replacement elements you will see certification claims on almost every listing. We checked each one against the certifier’s own database, and a consistent pattern emerged that changes how you should read them.

In this category, performance certifications are almost always issued against a complete system, naming a specific element as the replacement component inside it. They are not issued against the element as a standalone part that fits anything. So an element marketed as fitting Berkey, ProOne, Boroux and Alexapure housings may be genuinely certified, and that certification was still established in the maker’s own unit.

That is not a reason to avoid these filters. It is a reason to read the claim precisely, because the same words mean different things depending on what the certificate covers.

What each element is actually certified for

ElementCertifierCertified reduction claimsCertified asRated capacity
Culligan MaxClear MCF701 IAPMO R&T Lead, total PFAS (NSF/ANSI 53) · microplastics, atenolol, carbamazepine, DEET, linuron, meprobamate, metolachlor, trimethoprim (NSF/ANSI 401) · aesthetic effects (42) · lead-free materials (372) Component of MaxClear Venture and Scout systems 50 gallons per filter
ProOne G3.0 IAPMO R&T Lead, total PFAS (53) · microplastics (401) · chlorine, chloramine, particulate class I (42) · lead-free materials (372) Component of ProOne Big+ and Traveler+ systems. The element alone is listed for materials safety only 50 gallons per filter
Phoenix Gravity PGF9-2 NSF International Chlorine, taste and odour (NSF/ANSI 42). No health-effects certification listed Filter cartridge component in its own right Tested to 4,000 litres, about 1,057 gallons
Doulton Ultra Sterasyl W9121226 NSF International Cysts, turbidity (53) · microplastics (401) · nominal particulate class I (42). No lead or PFAS claim listed Component of the British Berkefeld SS2 Ultra Sterasyl system Not applicable to mechanical filtration, per the listing

Certification records checked directly with NSF International and IAPMO R&T on 7 September 2026. IAPMO R&T and NSF International are different certification bodies; both certify products against NSF/ANSI standards, so a product certified by IAPMO is not “NSF certified” even when the standard number is the same.

One claim worth checking yourself. Phoenix Gravity elements are widely listed as certified to both NSF/ANSI 42 and NSF/ANSI/CAN 372. NSF’s listing shows the PGF9-2 element under standard 42. The 372 records appear against the complete Phoenix Gravity pour-through systems, which are a different product from the replacement element.

Two further points on how these standards are described in the wild. NSF/ANSI/CAN 372 governs how much lead is in the product’s own materials, the lead-free plumbing requirement, and it is not a claim about removing lead from water. And figures like “reduces 200 or more contaminants” are third-party laboratory testing rather than certification, which is a meaningful difference: testing is a set of results, certification adds ongoing factory surveillance and audit.

The payoff

What to buy if you need elements now

All three of these drop into a standard Berkey stainless housing. They differ substantially in what has actually been certified, and that is the basis for the order below.

Why MaxClear first

It holds four active IAPMO R&T certificates covering more ground than anything else we could verify in gravity filtration. Lead and total PFAS under NSF/ANSI 53, and under NSF/ANSI 401 a list that includes microplastics alongside four named pharmaceuticals and three pesticides. Nothing else in this category comes close on breadth of certified claim.

The honest caveat is the one that applies to the whole category. Those claims were certified in Culligan’s own MaxClear Venture and Scout systems, with the MCF701 named as the replacement component. Using the element in a Berkey housing is outside what the certificate covers, even though it fits.

The second caveat is capacity. The certified rating is 50 gallons per filter, which for a household drinking a couple of gallons a day is a matter of weeks rather than months. Running the element longer is not unsafe, but you are past the point the certificate speaks to.

Where the others fit

Phoenix Gravity is the element New Millennium Concepts endorses for use in Berkey systems, and it is the only one here whose element holds a certification in its own right rather than as part of a system. That certification is narrow: chlorine, taste and odour. If your water is municipally treated and taste is your concern, that is a reasonable match, and the tested capacity of roughly 1,057 gallons per element is far longer than the 50-gallon ratings above.

ProOne Big+ is the option if you would rather buy a system whose certification actually covers the way you are using it. Note that ProOne is being brought under the Culligan MaxClear brand, so this is the outgoing line even though the certificates remain active and the filters remain compatible.

British Berkefeld with Ultra Sterasyl candles is worth knowing about for a specific case. It is the only option here certified for cyst reduction, which matters more for untreated or emergency supplies than for city water. It carries no lead or PFAS claim.

If you are reconsidering gravity filtration altogether, our best gravity water filters roundup covers the category, and countertop reverse osmosis is the usual step up for anyone who wants certified health claims without a plumbing job.

Common questions

Questions people ask about this

Is my existing Berkey system safe to keep using?

The EPA orders are directed at the sale, use and removal of covered products by their named recipients, which are businesses in the supply chain rather than households. They do not make a finding about the safety of water from a system you already own. If that distinction matters for your situation, read the orders themselves, linked below.

Why did the EPA call a water filter a pesticide?

Under FIFRA, a pesticide is defined partly by intent, meaning a substance intended for preventing, destroying, repelling or mitigating a pest. The definition of a pest includes bacteria and viruses. The orders record marketing and labelling claims about removing pathogens, and conclude that those claims brought the products within that definition.

Are the orders still in force?

The May 2023 order states that it remains in effect unless and until revoked, terminated, suspended or modified in writing by the EPA. As of 7 September 2026, both dockets show a status of active and neither records any filing after the original order.

Do Phoenix or MaxClear elements fit a Berkey housing?

Both are sold as fitting standard Berkey stainless gravity systems, and both use the same mounting arrangement. What does not transfer is the certification: the performance claims for MaxClear were certified in Culligan’s own systems, and the same pattern applies to ProOne. Phoenix is the exception in that its element holds a listing of its own, though for a much narrower set of claims.

What does NSF/ANSI 401 actually cover?

It covers a defined list of emerging compounds and incidental contaminants, and a certificate names the specific substances the product was certified to reduce. That is why two products both certified to 401 can differ so much: the MaxClear listing names eight substances, while the ProOne listing names microplastics alone. Our guide to NSF certification explains how the standards divide up.

How do I know an element I am buying is genuine?

Buy from an authorised dealer, and if the listing makes a certification claim, look the product up in the certifier’s database using the model number. Both NSF and IAPMO R&T publish searchable listings, and a real certificate will name the company, the model and the exact claims.

MC
About the author

Marcus Chen

Marcus Chen is a water quality engineer with over 12 years of experience in residential and municipal water treatment systems.

The DrinkingWaterFilter newsletter

Know what's in your water,
and what actually removes it.

Join our email list for new filter reviews, plain-English contaminant guides, and honest pick updates. No fear-mongering, no spam.

A couple of emails a month. We respect your inbox, and you can unsubscribe anytime.